Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency JAXA Sitemap

TOP > Report & Column > The Forefront of Space Science > 2008 > Develop a Low Environmental Impact Propellant

The Forefront of Space Science

Develop a Low Environmental Impact Propellant
| 1 | 2 | 3 |


While previously the term “low-pollutionEwas frequently used, today we mostly use “low environmental impact.EWhen talking about rockets, the immediate keywords are “high-performance,E“high-reliabilityEand “low cost.EThe keyword “low environmental impactEwas also always used in the past, but its priority was low and few took it seriously. However, the situation concerning rocket propellant is now changing.

In solid-propellant rockets, ammonium perchlorate (NH4ClO4) is included as an oxidizer and aluminum (Al) as a metallic fuel. When the fuel is burnt, hydrogen chloride (HCl) gas and alumina (Al2O3) particles are emitted. You will intuitively grasp that the oxidizer NH4ClO4 decomposes to generate HCl, and that the aluminum burns (i.e., oxidizes) to become alumina. Hydrogen chloride is prone to combine with hydrochloric acid, and that is known to be harmful to the environment. Although alumina is not basically harmful, it may cause problems because it is released in the form of fine particles. Recently, fine particles called nano-particles have drawn a lot of attention. With few exceptions, most fine particles have a harmful effect on the human body. A close investigation of the hazardousness of alumina fine particles remains to be conducted, but we cannot deny the risk.

Since their emission amounts are negligible, questions have not been raised so far. This is not an era, however, where even a small amount can be disregarded. In the current circumstances, we have to be responsible for any environmental impact no matter how small. In addition, strict opinions on alumina particles are now emerging, mainly from Europe, regarding space debris. From a long-term viewpoint, the goal must surely be hydrogen-chloride free in “lowerEspace (near to the ground) and fine-particle free in “upperEspace (outer space). To this end, one of the following options is necessary:


(1) Replacement of solid rockets with liquid rockets.
(2) Development of a hybrid rocket using both solid and liquid propellants to replace solid rockets.
(3) Investigation of materials and development of a solid fuel that is free of hydrogen-chloride and fine particles.

Option (1) may be possible, but it is out of my scope, and in any case, the complete replacement with liquid rockets is extremely difficult. This article therefore limits discussion to options (2) and (3).

Hybrid rocket using GAP

The first is the hybrid rocket. There are several types, including the general one that burns fuel polymers using liquid oxidizers (on the premise that the materials used are free of chlorine atoms and metal particles). Various combustion methods have been tried, but the fuel polymers failed to burn as powerfully as expected. Accordingly, we have to find a more powerful polymer.

One candidate is a substance called Glycidyl Azide Polymer (GAP). It contains azido group (-N3) in the molecule and the structure is shown in Fig. 1. The azido group is very high-energetic and, when it decomposes to emit nitrogen (N2), it generates extremely high heat. This heat is the “power sourceEof GAP. Moreover, it burns by itself without an oxidizer feed. GAP is thus a very valuable polymer.


Figure 1
Figure 1. Molecular structure of Glycidyl Azide Polymer (GAP)



| 1 | 2 | 3 |